Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

EOIR / Immigration Judge

Judge Shuting Chen San Francisco Immigration Court · Asylum Decision Statistics

Over the trailing 12 months, Immigration Judge Chen, Shuting granted asylum in 41.9% of decided cases at the San Francisco Immigration Court, based on FOIA-released EOIR data.

Free, Confidential Case Review

Have a case before Judge Chen?

These are past statistics, not a prediction of your case. Leave your name and number for a free, confidential review from an immigration attorney.

Free. No obligation. Your information is never shared.or call now 1-844-967-3536

Latest 12-month grant rate

41.9%

Asylum decisions, trailing 12 months

Lifetime total cases

1,130

All recorded asylum decisions

FY2026 court average

22.9%

Complete fiscal year: Oct 2025 – Sep 2026

Court average before the 2025 change

85.0%

FY2024 baseline: Oct 2023 – Sep 2024

FY2024 was the last full fiscal year before the January 2025 asylum-policy changes, so it is kept fixed as a before-and-after baseline rather than updated. More cases now close administratively, which shifts the merit-decision mix and is why the later figures are much lower.

Last data refresh

2026-10-23

From Deportation Data Project FOIA release

Monthly grant-rate trend

0%25%50%75%100%
Monthly grant-rate data
MonthGrant rate
2024-1294.4%
2025-0182.3%
2025-0247.4%
2025-0366.7%
2025-0473.9%
2025-0576.2%
2025-0660.0%
2025-0764.9%
2025-0854.8%
2025-0937.5%
2025-1060.0%
2025-1131.9%

These statistics describe past asylum decisions, not a prediction of any individual case. Your options depend on the specific facts of your case.

Methodology & sources

Primary source
Deportation Data Project (UC Berkeley) - FOIA-released EOIR case-level data.
Secondary source
TRAC Immigration (Syracuse University) - independent corroboration of grant-rate aggregates.
Last data refresh
2026-10-23

Statistical data only. Case outcomes depend on case-specific merits, evidence, and counsel quality. This page is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of any outcome.